Fraud On eBay – A Review Of The Stamp
Category
According to a CNET report
of
June 5, 2002
, “eBay Chief Executive
Meg Whitman told shareholders that technology has already helped eBay
reduce its fraudulent sales rate, which she said is at less than one-tenth of 1
percent. Whitman said the software's ability to spot criminals will get better
as the database of fraudulent sales grows.”
There are different definitions of fraud. Maybe eBay defines “fraud” as
something they actually catch and stop. If such is the case, I can believe that
eBay is catching only one-tenth of one percent of sales as fraudulent. The
actual fraud rate, using a more standard definition of fraud, is probably
significantly higher.
Fraud is rampant in the collectible categories on eBay. Some of the frauds being
committed, such as the sale of fakes and forgeries as genuine, cannot be
determined using only high-tech solutions. Although it is sometimes not possible
to determine if a listing is accurate, it is often easy to be certain that a
listing is fraudulent. Yet eBay's "SafeHarbor" is not responsive to
complaints about fraudulent descriptions.
In the stamp category on eBay, which is the area I am most familiar with, I
estimate the fraud rate at roughly ten percent of all lots listed in the
category. This is based on a survey
described below with clear definitions of what I consider to be fraudulent
auctions.
The
survey
I did a survey of lots offered in the stamp category on eBay on
August 3, 2002
. Of 121,000 total lots in the stamp category, I estimated that 12,000 involved
one of the forms of fraud listed below. (see survey)
Definitions
of fraudulent stamp auction practices
1. Forged stamps being offered as genuine stamps. These can in many instances be
ascertained by examination of scans.
2. Faked covers being offered
as genuine. This entails covers with stamps substituted or missing, as well as
postmarks faked. This is often evident by examining the scans.
3. Manipulated or repaired stamp and covers being offered without description of
the manipulation. Major faults or repairs not mentioned in description. This is
often evident by examining the scans.
4. Material being offered “as is” that is, or should be, known to be
something other than as described. This includes material that has been
manipulated by the seller or seller’s agent directly, as well as mis-identified
stamps and rarities that should be accompanied by a certificate of authenticity
before offer. For example, an obvious forgery, or mis-identified stamp or cover
offered “as is” in an attempt to deceive.
5. The sale of postage stamps
that are commonly referred to as “illegal” issues. These are simply labels
that have the appearance of real postage stamps. They were never valid postage
in any country that is a member of the Universal Postal Union. These
“stamps” often have the name of fictional countries, including supposed
Russian
Republics
, etc. printed on them. They are produced to deceive collectors and many appeal
to topical collectors because they bear images of musicians, actors, or other
notable celebrities. I have no
problem with people collecting this material but they should not be placed in
postage stamp category except as cinderellas or clearly identified as being
labels rather than postage stamps.
Methods
employed to notify victims of fraud
In the past several methods have been employed by collectors to warn bidders
about fraudulent auctions when they were noticed. These methods included:
1. Placing a bid and then retracting the bid with explanation that item is a
forgery or with an explanation of whatever the fraud is.
2. Sending an email to a
bidder or buyer directly informing bidder that the listing is fraudulent.
3. Posting information
regarding the lot in question to one of the eBay discussion boards and then
sending an email to bidders and, after the sale, to the buyer, suggesting that
they visit the discussion board to learn why they consider the listing to be
fraudulent.
Ebay has now effectively blocked all three of the above listed methods used by
concerned observers to inform potential victims of fraudulent listings. Their
latest move, prohibiting the discussion on the boards of fraudulent listings,
has sealed off the most frequently used method.
Fraudulent
auction sellers not exposed by eBay feedback systems
The eBay feedback system is not effective in providing information regarding the
types of fraud listed above. The “victims” rarely know that they have been
deceived until well after the sale, if ever. As a result they do not post
negative feedback. Ebay has implemented several features that are apparently an
attempt to promote “reputable” dealers. The “power seller” logo is an
embarrassment to many because so many of the power sellers engage in fraudulent
practices. The new “square trade” feature seemingly gives sellers an
advantage in getting negative feedback removed from their profiles. Neither are
viable solutions.
Conclusion
Even though most of these types of fraud listed above also occur in the normal
stamp collecting marketplace, they are hidden from public view and can be
adequately policed when the perpetrators are exposed. The high visibility of
this type of fraud on eBay, and the fact that eBay has turned a deaf ear to
collector complaints, is very frustrating to those who strive for an honest,
viable and open internet marketplace. In addition, and perhaps more important
for long term health of eBay, sellers of correctly described goods cannot
achieve full value because their goods are in direct competition with
fraudulently described items.
I believe Ebay would be well served to hire category specific advisors.
A set of qualified advisors, empowered to review complaints and act in a
timely fashion, could substantially reduce the percentage of fraudulent auctions
on eBay in the collectible categories.
Richard
Frajola (August, 2002)